News Room
| September 3, 2003 |
Contact:
Jessica Mantooth,
NHPIRG
(603) 229-3222
Doug Bogen,
Clean Water Action
(603) 430-9565
|
As the new home of NHPIRG's environmental work, Environment New Hampshire may be contacted regarding this release.
Concord – As the governors
from most of the New England states gather this weekend in Mystic, Connecticut
for their annual meeting, a new report released today has found that they are
far off the pace to hit regional targets for reducing carbon pollution that
were set two years ago. New Hampshire Governor Craig Benson is not expected
to attend the meeting.
In 2001, the governors of
the six New England states and the premiers of the eastern Canadian provinces
made a landmark commitment to make regional cuts in the carbon pollution that
is fueling global warming. However, the report shows that regional commitments
made to date, if implemented, would significantly reduce global warming emissions
in New England, but not to the extent called for by the regional agreement.
The analysis concludes that the region will see less than one-third of the promised
pollution reductions unless further steps are taken to clean up cars, power
plants, and other sources.
"This report shows
that while some progress has been made in New England over the past few years
to address global warming, much remains to be done, especially in New Hampshire,
to meet even the governors’ short-term goals for dealing with this monumental
problem," said Jessica Mantooth of NHPIRG.
The report calculates projected
emission reductions from regional commitments made by the governors over the
last two years. These measures include boosting the efficiency of power plants,
improving conservation programs, and purchasing high-efficiency appliances like
LED traffic lights. The report also assesses progress of the individual states
toward developing their own climate action plans, a key component of the 2001
agreement.
In an attempt to address
what many policy makers and experts consider to be a growing threat to health,
economic and environmental stability in the region, the governors committed
to cut global warming pollution to 1990 levels by 2010, and by 10 percent below
1990 levels by 2020. They also agreed to cut pollution by 75 percent to 85 percent
in the long term, which is the level scientists predict will be necessary to
remove the threat global warming poses to the earth’s climate.
"We hope that Governor
Benson’s absence from this meeting is not indicative of his degree of concern
over global warming and other key issues before the New England governors,"
said Doug Bogen, NH Program Director for Clean Water Action. "New Hampshire
has a huge stake in getting global warming under control, and that will require
leadership to make things happen—leadership that is not yet evident from
this report."
The report emphasizes how
important it is for the health and economy of New Hampshire and the region that
strong global warming emission standards be implemented. Over the past decade,
global warming emissions have risen sharply in New England. If current trends
continue, the temperature in New England could increase six to ten degrees Fahrenheit
over the next century, bringing up the average temperature in Boston to that
of Atlanta, Georgia today and causing drastic changes to the regions’ coastal
areas, forests, water supplies and resource-based industries.
The New England Climate
Coalition, representing over 150 health, energy, environmental and faith groups
region-wide, has united around a 10 point platform of policies needed to significantly
reduce emissions of global warming pollutants further outlined in the report.
Regionally, the coalition urges the governors to adopt the following policies
coming out of the regional meeting next week:
• Aggressively promote a
regional cap on carbon pollution from fossil fuel-fired power plants that features
actual emission reductions and does not provide additional subsidies for nuclear
reactors.
• Establish a system of mandatory reporting and comprehensive inventories of
carbon dioxide and other global warming emissions by 2005.
• Release climate action plans that lay out the roadmap for each state to meet
its regional commitments.
"Just as we underestimated
the rate at which climate would change, we have underestimated the biological
responses to warming, the accompanying weather extremes, and the economic consequences,"
said Paul Epstein, MD, MPH, Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard
Medical School. "The good news is that we may have also underestimated
the benefits of the clean energy transition. Given the proper incentives, energy
efficiency and smart technologies can be the engine of growth for 21st Century,
and provide the climatic stability needed to maintain healthy forests and a
healthier populous."