As the new home of NHPIRG’s environmental work, Environment New Hampshire may be contacted regarding this release.
CONCORD
– In response to a new legislative proposal unveiled today for
reduction of mercury pollution from power plants, the New Hampshire
Clean Power Coalition has restated and emphasized their vision of smart
policy decisions for future generations and a strong economy without
relaxing mercury reductions. The Coalition’s vision is consistent with
SB128, a mercury bill that was approved by the state Senate last spring
but has since lost steam in the House.
“The
people of New Hampshire shouldn’t have to wait any longer for relief
from mercury pollution,” said Doug Bogen, representing the NH Clean
Power Coaltion. “New Hampshire has the opportunity to get it right,
without pollution trading or putting undue burden on ratepayers – this
proposal as written is simply the wrong approach.”
The
legislation, proposed by Representative Larry Ross of Peterborough,
Chair of the NH House Committee on Science, Technology and Energy, was
released to the public in the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
It will be taken up for hearings and debate by the legislature in 2006.
“This
bill makes PSNH look good by coupling mercury control with sulfur
reductions, but in fact, New Hampshire law already requires strong
sulfur reductions, said Carl Paulsen of the NH Rivers Council. “Given
the age and condition of these plants, the company is likely to have to
install sulfur scrubbers in the near future because of federal law
anyway. This proposal is simply sugar coated with sulfur controls to
make the weaker mercury controls more palatable.”
All
other New England states that have coal burning power plants have
already enacted strong laws to regulate mercury emissions, along with
New Jersey and Wisconsin. In June 2002, Connecticut approved a 90
percent reduction of mercury emissions from the state’s coal fired
power plants, to be applied by July, 2008.
The
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection released final
rules in May 2004 that call for an 85 percent reduction of mercury
emissions by 2008, followed by a 95 percent reduction by 2012.
Emissions trading is prohibited, and limited alternative local
mitigation is allowed for just two plants until 2012, when the exempted
plants will be required to meet the standard.
“All
we want is for New Hampshire to achieve some consistency with our
neighboring states’ mercury regulations,” said Erika Staaf of the New
Hampshire Public Interest Research Group. “We’d like to see equal if
not greater mercury reduction commitments and comparable timelines to
other states, so that we can eventually eliminate our mercury hotspots
in the state, as well as breathe a bit easier.”
“New
Hampshire has a serious mercury contamination problem that requires
bold action by this Legislature,” said Catherine Bowes, Mercury Program
Manager for the National Wildlife Federation. We will not see relief
from the high levels of mercury in our fish an wildlife until the
state’s major sources of emissions are required to reduce their
pollution as much as possible using cost-effective, available
technology.
The Clean Power Coalition:
• Supports the adoption of mercury reduction technology in advance of
this bill’s 2013 deadline. Four other neighboring states have enacted
laws to reduce mercury in a timely and sensible manner, instead of
complicating the process with loopholes that will delay reductions of
mercury emissions.
• Urges the use of existing or emerging technology to control 90
percent of the mercury from the largest unregulated sources of mercury
in our state. The current proposal adopts an 80 percent reduction
requirement, allowing higher mercury emissions than the bill passed
last session by the Senate.
• Does not support inter-pollutant trading. The proposal that was
announced today allows mercury reduction credits to be exchanged for
sulfur dioxide credits, which will specifically weaken current law by
increasing the existing state cap for sulfur dioxide, another harmful
pollutant.
• Supports real mercury pollution reductions to be required by law. New
Hampshire can and should pass legislation that will set the standard
for the rest of the nation, rather than setting an uncertain course
that bolsters the very federal mercury rule that New Hampshire is
currently suing to overturn.
The
Clean Power Coalition is a diverse group of statewide public interest,
consumer, conservation, public health, faith-based and recreation
organizations representing over 24,000 New Hampshire citizens who care
about healthy children, safe communities and continued protection of
our environment and wildlife.