|
|
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
John Sununu: No friend to New Hampshire drivers... or our air
2008-10-09
|
Summary
The Bottom Line
New Hampshire faces big transportation challenges, with congestion, pollution and the high cost of gas threatening New Hampshire drivers and our environment. Time and again, Sen. John Sununu has failed to rise to those challenges. Specifically, Sen. Sununu:
• Opposed increasing fuel economy standards for cars to 40 miles per gallon, a move that would have saved 1.1 million barrels of oil a day by 2020.
• Opposed a measure to encourage the development of plug-in hybrids and other high-tech alternative vehicles. If powered by clean electricity, plug-in hybrids can reduce the air pollution that puts the health of 1.1 million New Hampshire residents at risk.
• Voted against investing in improvements in passenger rail service, an increasingly attractive alternative to flying and driving for longer trips.
• Took $84,000 in campaign contributions from the oil industry during the 2007 to 2008 congressional session.
|
Full ReportNew Hampshire residents are fed up with congestion, pollution and gas prices
New Hampshire residents know that our transportation system isn’t doing the job. High gas prices are draining consumers’ pocketbooks. Traffic congestion takes away time we could spend at work, at play or at home with our families. And the pollution that comes from vehicle tailpipes fouls our air, harms our health, and contributes to the warming of the planet.
America needs a president who will lead the country with big, bold solutions that can cut the cost of commuting, provide new transportation options for more people, and clean up our air.
Unfortunately, Sen. John Sununu has consistently missed the mark when it comes to casting votes to solve New Hampshire’s transportation challenges.
Bad transportation policy keeps us hooked on oil and stuck in traffic
For decades, Big Oil, the automakers, the highway lobby and other powerful interests have held sway over transportation policy in Washington, D.C. Now, America’s drivers and our environment are paying the price. For example:
- Automakers have fought tooth and nail against stronger fuel economy standards for cars. As a result, America spends twice as much each year on gasoline as we did five years ago. That’s an additional $200 billion per year sucked out of Americans’ pocketbooks, with much of it sent to unfriendly nations overseas.[1]
- Similarly, automakers have fought stronger emission standards for cars. Emissions from cars are a major source of air pollution such as smog and are a leading contributor to global warming. The gasoline we use in our cars and trucks produces more carbon dioxide—the leading global warming pollutant—than the entire economy of any other nation in the world other than China, Russia and Japan,[2] and unhealthy air affects 125 million Americans.[3]
- The highway lobby has fought for more money for new highways while starving transportation alternatives of funding. Since 1956, the government has spent $2.5 trillion more dollars on highways than on public transportation.[4] As a result, many Americans have no good transportation options, condemning drivers to spend more than 4.2 billion hours sitting in traffic.[5]
Transportation choices for the 21st century
America has the know-how to take on our transportation challenges. We have the technology to make cars and trucks that use less gas and produce less pollution. We can provide transportation choices like modern public transit to more Americans, relieving pressure on our overcrowded roads. We can also take advantage of clean, alternative sources of energy. For example:
- The technology exists to make our cars and trucks go much farther on a gallon of gasoline. Automakers could achieve a fleet average of 40 miles per gallon within 10 years with existing technology.[6]
- New technologies such as plug-in hybrids—which use a combination of gasoline and electricity—could allow cars to get more than 100 miles per gallon, saving more than $1,500 at the pump, while reducing pollution.[7] Several automakers are now racing to produce plug-in hybrids within the next two years.[8]
- Cities across the country are pushing to expand their public transportation systems to accommodate a surge in demand for transportation alternatives. Transit ridership hit a 50-year high in 2007.[9] Interest is also growing in building new high-speed rail links between American cities to provide an alternative to the hassles of flying and driving. High-speed trains can reach up to 200 miles per hour while using far less oil.
Americans are hungry for alternatives to traffic congestion, high gas prices, and polluting vehicles. But achieving a better transportation future means taking on powerful interests in Washington, D.C.
The 2008 election and America’s transportation needs
New Hampshire needs a leader to is willing to stand up to the auto industry, Big Oil and other powerful interests and work for real solutions to safeguard drivers’ pocketbooks, clean up our air, and keep New Hampshire moving.
Unfortunately, during his time as a U.S. senator, John Sununu has been a consistent “no” vote on the most important transportation issues.
Sen. Sununu: Bad for Drivers and Our Air
Time and again, Sen. John Sununu has sided with the auto industry and Big Oil against the interests of New Hampshire drivers. Sen. Sununu:
- Opposed increasing fuel economy standards for cars to 40 miles per gallon, a move that would have saved 1.1 million barrels of oil a day by 2020.[10] (Sununu did later back a less-ambitious increase in fuel economy standards.)
- Opposed a measure to encourage the development of plug-in hybrids and other high-tech alternative vehicles.[11] If powered by clean electricity, plug-in hybrids can reduce the air pollution that puts the health of 1.1 million New Hampshire residents at risk.[12]
- Voted against investing in improvements in passenger rail service,[13]an increasingly attractive alternative to flying and driving for longer trips.
- Took $84,000 in campaign contributions from the oil industry during the 2007 to 2008 congressional session.[14]
The choice for New Hampshire: Jeanne Shaheen for Senate
By electing Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire drivers can ensure that they have a champion fighting for their interests—and not those of the auto industry or Big Oil—in the critical decisions that face the next Congress. Her leadership in New Hampshire on important energy efficiency initiatives demonstrates that Jeanne Shaheen is the kind of leader who will move New Hampshire toward a new energy future.
About Environment New Hampshire
We all want clean air, clean water and open space. But it takes independent research and tough-minded advocacy to win concrete results for our environment, especially when powerful interests stand in the way of environmental progress. That's the idea behind Environment New Hampshire. We focus exclusively on protecting New Hampshire’s air, water and open space. We speak out and take action at the local, state and national levels to improve the quality of our environment and our lives.
Paid for by Environment New Hampshire at www.EnvironmentNewHampshire.org and Environment America at www.EnvironmentAmerica.org.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
|
Sources[1] U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2007, 23 June 2008.
[2] Emissions from oil from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2006, 28 November 2007; International emissions from U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, International Energy Annual 2005, 1 October 2007.
[3] American Lung Association, State of the Air 2008, 2008.
[4] U.S. PIRG Education Fund, A Better Way to Go: Meeting America’s 21st Century Transportation Challenges with Modern Public Transit, March 2008.
[5] David Schrank and Tim Lomax, Texas Transportation Institute, The 2007 Urban Mobility Report, September 2007.
[6] Union of Concerned Scientists, Common Sense on Climate Change Solutions #1: Make Better Cars and SUVs, downloaded from www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/global_warming_101/common-sense-solution-1.html, 19 September 2008.
[7] Environment America, Reduce Our Oil Dependence: Support S. 3335 and Credits for Plug-In Electric Vehicles, undated.
[8]
Both General Motors and Toyota have pledged to produce plug-in hybrid
vehicles around 2010. See Micheline Maynard, “Toyota Will Offer a
Plug-In Hybrid by 2010,” New York Times, 14 January 2008.
[9] American Public Transportation Association, 10.3
Billion Trips Taken on Public Transportation Ridership in 2007 – The
Highest Level in 50 Years; Ridership Increased as Gas Prices Remained
High, press release, 10 March 2008.
[10] NO vote on Senate amendment 1384, Roll call vote #309, 29 July 2003, Congressional Record, 29 July 2003, S10114.
[11] NO vote on cloture for S. 3335, Jobs, Energy, Families, and Disaster Relief Act of 2008, Vote #192, 30 July 2008.
[12] American Lung Association, State of the Air 2008, 2008.
[13] NO vote on HR 2095, Federal Rail Safety Improvement Act, Roll call vote #210, 1 October 2008, Congressional Record, 1 October 2008, S10290.
[14] Contributions from oil industry based on Oil Change International, Follow the Oil Money database, data downloaded from oilmoney.priceofoil.org/index.php, 19 September 2008.
|
|